When the Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Programme (PMNDP) was launched in 2016 under the National Health Mission, it was pitched as a game-changer for poor patients with end-stage kidney disease. The idea was simple but powerful: set up dialysis units in government district hospitals across India and offer free haemodialysis to people below the poverty line, instead of forcing them to depend only on expensive private centres.
Almost a decade later, the big question is: has the programme truly reached every corner of India, especially rural areas, or is it still concentrated in a few better-equipped urban hospitals?
What the Programme Promises on Paper
PMNDP’s core objectives are:
Strengthen district hospitals by establishing dialysis units
Provide affordable or free dialysis, especially for poor and vulnerable patients
Use public–private partnerships (PPP) where needed, while some states run in-house government services nhsrcindia.org
According to official data, the programme has expanded significantly:
Implemented in all 36 States and Union Territories
Covers around 751 districts across the country
As of June 30, 2025, 1,704 dialysis centres are operational under PMNDP
A 2024 parliamentary reply reported over 10,000 functional dialysis machines in 748 districts under the programme, providing free dialysis to eligible patients, particularly those below the poverty line.
On paper, this sounds impressive: almost every district now has at least one government-supported dialysis centre, and lakhs of dialysis sessions are being provided free or at highly subsidised rates each year.
How It Links with Ayushman Bharat
PMNDP doesn’t work in isolation. Many patients also receive financial protection under Ayushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY), which offers up to ₹5 lakh per family per year for secondary and tertiary care, including procedures like dialysis in empanelled hospitals.
This combination – PMNDP in public hospitals and AB-PMJAY in both public and private hospitals – is meant to reduce out-of-pocket expenses and make life-saving dialysis more accessible to poor and vulnerable populations.
The Rural Reality: Coverage vs. Access
However, the picture looks less perfect when we zoom into rural India.
Several analyses of dialysis services in India point to a consistent pattern:
Around 90% of dialysis facilities are located in urban and semi-urban areas such as metro cities and tier-1 / tier-2 towns.
Nathealth
More than 60% of patients on dialysis reportedly travel long distances—often 50 km or more—for each session. For a treatment that is typically required two to three times a week, this travel burden is enormous.
Even though PMNDP claims district-level presence, this doesn’t automatically mean true accessibility for villagers:
Many rural patients still depend on a single district hospital dialysis unit, which may be 50–100 km away.
Transport costs, lost wages, and weak public transport become hidden barriers, even when the dialysis itself is free.
In some smaller districts and remote areas, centres may exist on paper but function with limited capacity—few machines, staffing gaps, frequent breakdowns or irregular sessions.
So, while geographical coverage looks good on a national map, functional access for rural citizens is still patchy.
Implementation Gaps: Beyond Just Announcements
Official press releases highlight expansion in terms of centres and machines. But on the ground, several challenges keep coming up in reports, studies and field experiences:
Infrastructure and Maintenance
Dialysis units need reliable electricity, clean water (including RO plants), infection control, and regular machine maintenance.
Rural and smaller facilities often struggle with frequent interruptions, leading to cancellations or reduced sessions for patients.
Human Resources
Dialysis requires trained technicians, nurses and nephrologists.
Many district hospitals, especially in rural or remote regions, face shortages of trained staff or rely on visiting specialists from cities.
PubMed Central
Uneven Quality and Outcomes
Research on dialysis centres across India shows wide variation in survival and outcomes between centres, suggesting differences in quality of care, infection control and management standards.
Awareness and Late Diagnosis
A recent screening study in Andhra Pradesh found that over half of people screened had some degree of CKD, but only a tiny fraction knew they had kidney disease.
If patients are diagnosed late, they arrive at dialysis units already in advanced disease, with more complications and poorer prognosis. PMNDP then becomes a last-minute rescue, rather than part of a continuum of early care.
All of this raises a genuine concern: is PMNDP a fully mobilised, deeply embedded health service, or is it still partly an “announcement-heavy, urban-leaning” programme whose benefits are unevenly felt?
Is It Really Helping Citizens Everywhere?
To be fair, the programme has changed the landscape of dialysis access in India:
Free or subsidised dialysis in government hospitals has reduced catastrophic health expenditure for many poor families.
States like Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have expanded dialysis centres even to some community health centres, showing that decentralisation is possible beyond district headquarters.
But several critical questions remain:
Are tribal, hilly and remote districts getting the same quality of services as large cities?
Are machines functional and staffed consistently, or are there long waiting lists and frequent downtime?
Are women, elderly citizens and extremely poor households able to reach centres regularly, or do travel costs still push them to drop out of treatment?
The current data suggests that while PMNDP has expanded the availability of dialysis, there is still a major gap in equitable and convenient access, especially for rural and marginalised communities.
Rural India: What More Is Needed?
If the aim is to truly turn PMNDP into a nationwide lifeline rather than a patchy network, several steps become crucial:
Bring Dialysis Closer to Villages
Set up satellite dialysis units not just in district hospitals, but also in selected community health centres or sub-district hospitals in large rural blocks.
Explore mobile dialysis units for very remote regions, with strong backup for power and water.
Strengthen Human Resources
Create dedicated training programmes for dialysis technicians and nurses, with incentives to work in rural and semi-rural areas.
Use tele-nephrology to support centres without full-time nephrologists, linking them to specialists in teaching hospitals and medical colleges.
Focus on Quality and Monitoring
Regular audits of machine functionality, infection rates, session cancellations and patient feedback.
Public dashboards or transparent reporting could help identify districts where centres exist only on paper or work at very low capacity.
Integrate Prevention and Early Detection
Combine PMNDP with strong CKD screening in primary health centres under the national non-communicable disease programmes.
Regular blood and urine tests for people with diabetes, hypertension or obesity can detect kidney damage early, delaying the need for dialysis.
Better Transport and Financial Support for Rural Families
For many rural patients, the biggest burden is not the cost of dialysis but the cost of getting there.
Travel allowances, patient transport services or tie-ups with local panchayats could significantly improve adherence to treatment schedules.
More Than a Scheme on Paper
Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Programme is, without doubt, an important and necessary initiative in a country with a huge and growing burden of chronic kidney disease. It has expanded the availability of dialysis, brought services into government hospitals, and given lakhs of poor patients a chance at life that they might otherwise never have had.
But to answer your concern honestly: it is not yet uniformly helping citizens all over India to the same degree. Rural India, remote regions and the poorest households still face barriers of distance, information, and quality of care. In some places, PMNDP is a fully functional lifeline; in others, it risks becoming just another announcement whose benefits are felt mainly in better-connected hospitals.
The next phase of the programme must therefore focus less on counting machines and centres, and more on equity, quality and rural access. Only then can India say that its national dialysis programme is not just launched, but truly mobilised for every kidney patient who needs it—regardless of where they live.
